Colleges Should Fear Government Loan Proposal
Sunday, December 27th, 2009After reading Jim Wolfston’s Point of View “Let’s Kick the Lenders Out of the Student Loan System” (The Chronicle, February 27) I was surprised by its headline. A more appropriate headline would have been “Let’s Kick Schools Out of the Student Loan System.”
For 43 years, the higher education loan community has provided more than $650 billion to tens of millions of students. But the more important contributions of guaranty agencies, lenders, and other organizations come from the services they provide, which range from college access and financial literacy education to default prevention. In the past year alone, more than $52 billion in loans were averted from entering default.
A year ago even before the full extent of the mortgage crisis was known news stories predicted a crisis in student loans. The student loan community worked with Congress and the administration to formulate a solution to assure the availability of student loan funds at no cost to the federal government. As a result of the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act, every borrower who needed a student loan for the 2008-2009 school year was able to get one. And given the huge amount of debt the federal government is incurring to mitigate the broader financial meltdown, the student loan programs stand out. They are cost neutral to taxpayers and allow the federal government to avoid piling on additional dollars to the trillion dollar national debt by making sure that most student loans will be financed by the private capital markets, rather than the Treasury.
If, as Mr. Wolfston proposes, a college’s total student loan financing were to come from federal sources, the institution might be subject to uniform, one size fits all standards for tuition, fees, and executive compensation, and to reporting requirements more extensive than those that are in place today. Many states are already bristling at the increased federal oversight accompanying the stimulus bill funds, and colleges might react with similar apprehension. They would also lose the advantage of being able to choose their student loan providers. Today’s students are tomorrow’s alumni, and an unpleasant experience with a student loan might result in a lack of support to the institution.